Ping

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ping

    Sou, I will give free hosting to all people for free.
    Sou you can ask, what is good in my server
    There is answer:

    [root@localhost ~]# ping e-vaizdas.net
    PING e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=129 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=129 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=129 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=129 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=129 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=129 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=129 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=128 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=129 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=129 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=11 ttl=51 time=129 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=12 ttl=51 time=130 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=13 ttl=51 time=131 ms
    64 bytes from on.e-vaizdas.net (83.149.104.95): icmp_seq=14 ttl=51 time=129 ms

    --- e-vaizdas.net ping statistics ---
    14 packets transmitted, 14 received, 0% packet loss, time 13019ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 128.805/129.674/131.539/0.720 ms
    [root@localhost ~]# ping cp2.serv.lt
    PING cp2.serv.lt (84.16.244.11 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from cp2.serv.lt (84.16.244.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=46.4 ms
    64 bytes from cp2.serv.lt (84.16.244.11: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=42.9 ms
    64 bytes from cp2.serv.lt (84.16.244.11: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=41.6 ms
    64 bytes from cp2.serv.lt (84.16.244.11: icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=46.6 ms
    64 bytes from cp2.serv.lt (84.16.244.11: icmp_seq=5 ttl=53 time=46.1 ms
    64 bytes from cp2.serv.lt (84.16.244.11: icmp_seq=6 ttl=53 time=41.7 ms
    64 bytes from cp2.serv.lt (84.16.244.11: icmp_seq=7 ttl=53 time=46.3 ms
    64 bytes from cp2.serv.lt (84.16.244.11: icmp_seq=8 ttl=53 time=46.5 ms

    --- cp2.serv.lt ping statistics ---
    8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7006ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.642/44.805/46.629/2.147 ms
    [root@localhost ~]#

    e-vaizdas.net is the biggest hosting provider in Lithuania.
    84.16.244.118 is my server ip.
    Sou what do you think?My server is in Europe, Germany. On 100mbps internet line.

    #2
    Tomorow I will buy DirectAdmin panel license, what do you think about this panel?
    Write now, I ill, but I try to open hosting soon

    Comment


      #3
      not sure bro but i like in side of host
      Visit: Chat4u.mobi - The New Lay Of being a site of your dreams!
      Visit: WapMasterz Coming Back Soon!
      _______
      SCRIPTS FOR SALE BY SUBZERO
      Chat4u Script : coding-talk.com/f28/chat4u-mobi-script-only-150-a-17677/ - > Best Script for your site no other can be hacked by sql or uploaders.
      FileShare Script : coding-talk.com/f28/file-wap-share-6596/ -> Uploader you will never regret buying yeah it mite be old now but it still seems to own others...
      _______
      Info & Tips
      php.net
      w3schools.com

      Comment


        #4
        not sure bro but i like in side of host[/b]
        I think DirectAdminPanel is far better than VHCL or CpanelX with its features.
        Its also affordable. I say buy DirectAdminPanel instead of VHCL or Cpanel.
        1. VHCL -Better than Cpanel
        2. CPANEL - Better than OpticalWebControl
        3. DirectAdminPanel-Better thank VHCL,CPANEL,OpticalWebControl.

        Comment

        Working...
        X