Be or not to be WML?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pmbguy
    replied
    ok, well, about the wml option being any different...

    from my experience, the biggest difference in the speed a site loads is the images...
    ie: if you have a 100KB+ animated logo, xhtml, or wml gonna crawl like hell cause it's got to load the logo before the rest of the page
    (praise opera for sorting this out!!!)

    and in my case connection speed.
    (i've had wml pages time out too!)

    Like sure there's a small filesize difference in code etc, but nothing major enough to jump for joy over...
    then next, you get certain features that you just can't do with wml, like javascript n css, etc...
    like i've been asked to port my site to wml... i'm like wtf? i coded it in xhtml cause as wml...

    (no uploader, no javascript stuff, etc...) ie: most stuff i coded is rendered useless...

    my solution: OPERA MINI!!! Works with xhtml n strips size down!!!
    ie: wml pages in phone browser work out bigger than xhtml pages in opera normally cause of images...

    Leave a comment:


  • Mars
    replied
    Originally posted by drahmad View Post
    i think its already dead, who use it still?
    and my phone does not support wml

    Leave a comment:


  • drahmad
    replied
    Its dead

    Originally posted by Mars View Post
    What do you think how long WML will live?
    i think its already dead, who use it still?
    Last edited by GumSlone; 08.06.10, 11:26. Reason: removed link from post, next time youll get a ban

    Leave a comment:


  • GumSlone
    replied
    Originally posted by shad0w View Post
    WML will live at least 5 more years..
    WML pages are loading faster on mobile phones than html/xhtml...
    why do you think so?
    if you use simpe tags without styles etc the html/xhtml page will be smaller or of the same size like wml page.
    so it doesnt make any sense to use wml.
    take a look,
    wml:
    HTML Code:
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
    <wml>
    <card id="main" title="Title">
    <p>
    <img src="images/logo.gif" alt=""/>
    <br/>
    Your text here
    </p>
    </card>
    </wml>
    xhtml:
    HTML Code:
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD XHTML Mobile 1.0//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd">
    <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <head>
    <title>Title</title>
    </head>
    <body>
    <p>
    <img src="images/logo.gif" alt=""/>
    <br/>
    Your text here
    </p>
    </body>
    </html>
    wml: 234 bytes
    html: 302 bytes only because of a bit larger header

    Leave a comment:


  • metulj
    replied
    Originally posted by shad0w View Post
    ...WML pages are loading faster on mobile phones than html/xhtml...
    are you sure?

    Leave a comment:


  • shad0w
    replied
    WML will live at least 5 more years..
    WML pages are loading faster on mobile phones than html/xhtml...

    Leave a comment:


  • wapmetal
    replied
    wml is good because when you surf wml pages no hussle specially wht phones lol i love wml cuz pages makes fast..

    Leave a comment:


  • Shifty
    replied
    ooooohh. this subj as old as my grandma...
    certainly, wml will die.
    but when - nobody knows

    Leave a comment:


  • something else
    replied
    Originally posted by ksg91 View Post
    it isnt a programming language but mark up language..
    Originally posted by something else View Post
    however wml is regarded closer to a true programming language than html
    As said above

    Leave a comment:


  • metulj
    replied
    Originally posted by something else View Post
    Thats 1 thing your always hot on metulj .... Validating your sites
    well... validating site is very important...
    imagine... w3c is WEB(and WAP) standard...
    and while manufacturer make their phones...
    they follow those standards when programming browsers for phones...

    now... site which doesnt pass validation...
    • it may show errors in phone browser(or it may cos problems to load, which is basicly the same)
    • it will increase trafic for users
    • it may load server a lot more than actually needed
    • in worst case scenario, it wont be even displayed on some phones
    now you tell me...
    is it better to spend some time on validation
    or is better any of above

    Leave a comment:


  • ksg91
    replied
    Originally posted by something else View Post
    Wml is only about 1 percent of all pages on the net ..... however wml is regarded closer to a true programming language than html, As wml can support variables such as setvar
    and even support events such as timer Which Is heavily used on a lot of sites to make older phones (that only supported 10 cached pages) Stay On your Site By Forwarding The Phones Browser 10 Times To Different pages on your site. Making It impossible for people to leave your site by pushing there back button.

    So Is wml as bad as everyone makes out?
    it isnt a programming language but mark up language..
    Originally posted by GumSlone View Post
    for me wml is dead,
    gum, i was going to say exactly same sentance lol...

    well, i never learnt wml and never gonna..

    Leave a comment:


  • something else
    replied
    Thats 1 thing your always hot on metulj .... Validating your sites

    Leave a comment:


  • metulj
    replied
    Originally posted by khan89 View Post
    older phones not yet support xhtml.and wml is like that star in the sky that comes like rocket..will left like electric train.LOLZ..
    And the countries still under developing,third worlds country like srilanka, Bangladesh, India bla bla bla... net cost is high.thats why wml is still alive.
    keepin WML alive just due to high net connection cost
    is the biggest nonsense really...
    properly(and yes... VALID !) coded site with XHTML
    wont cause much bigger trafic than same code in WML...

    the difference in trafic is so low it's not even worth to mention it really...

    Leave a comment:


  • khan
    replied
    older phones not yet support xhtml.and wml is like that star in the sky that comes like rocket..will left like electric train.LOLZ..
    And the countries still under developing,third worlds country like srilanka, Bangladesh, India bla bla bla... net cost is high.thats why wml is still alive.

    Leave a comment:


  • honkytonkman
    replied
    Originally posted by GumSlone View Post
    for me wml is dead,
    but i liked it more than xhtml/html,
    probably because that was the first "programming" language which i've learned.
    yeah..i also have the same feeling..
    but xhtml is more easy to do
    and by now is supported by all phones

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X